| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/03/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MARCELINO, F. C.; GUIMARÃES, M. F. M.; BARROS, E. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Francismar Correa Marcelino, Embrapa Soja; Marta Fonseca Martins Guimaraes, Embrapa Gado de Leite; Everaldo Gonçalves de Barros, Bioagro / UFV. |
|
Título: |
Detection and quantification of Roundup Ready soybean residues in sausage samples by conventional and real-time PCR. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, v. 28, p. 38-45, 2008. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612008000500007 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Supl. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The increasing presence of products derived from genetically modified (GM) plants in human and animal diets has led to the development of detection methods to distinguish biotechnology-derived foods from conventional ones. The conventional and real-time PCR have been used, respectively, to detect and quantify GM residues in highly processed foods. DNA extraction is a critical step during the analysis process. Some factors such as DNA degradation, matrix effects, and the presence of PCR inhibitors imply that a detection or quantification limit, established for a given method, is restricted to a matrix used during validation and cannot be projected to any other matrix outside the scope of the method. In Brazil, sausage samples were the main class of processed products in which Roundup Ready® (RR) soybean residues were detected. Thus, the validation of methodologies for the detection and quantification of those residues is absolutely necessary. Sausage samples were submitted to two different methods of DNA extraction: modified Wizard and the CTAB method. The yield and quality were compared for both methods. DNA samples were analyzed by conventional and real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of Roundup Ready® soybean in the samples. At least 200 ng of total sausage DNA was necessary for a reliable quantification. Reactions containing DNA amounts below this value led to large variations on the expected GM percentage value. In conventional PCR, the detection limit varied from 1.0 to 500 ng, depending on the GM soybean content in the sample. The precision, performance, and linearity were relatively high indicating that the method used for analysis was satisfactory. MenosThe increasing presence of products derived from genetically modified (GM) plants in human and animal diets has led to the development of detection methods to distinguish biotechnology-derived foods from conventional ones. The conventional and real-time PCR have been used, respectively, to detect and quantify GM residues in highly processed foods. DNA extraction is a critical step during the analysis process. Some factors such as DNA degradation, matrix effects, and the presence of PCR inhibitors imply that a detection or quantification limit, established for a given method, is restricted to a matrix used during validation and cannot be projected to any other matrix outside the scope of the method. In Brazil, sausage samples were the main class of processed products in which Roundup Ready® (RR) soybean residues were detected. Thus, the validation of methodologies for the detection and quantification of those residues is absolutely necessary. Sausage samples were submitted to two different methods of DNA extraction: modified Wizard and the CTAB method. The yield and quality were compared for both methods. DNA samples were analyzed by conventional and real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of Roundup Ready® soybean in the samples. At least 200 ng of total sausage DNA was necessary for a reliable quantification. Reactions containing DNA amounts below this value led to large variations on the expected GM percentage value. In conventional PCR, the detection limit vari... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
GMO; PCR quantitative; Sausage; Transgenic residues. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/596463/1/Detection-and-quantification-of-Roundup-Ready-soybean.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02405naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1596463
005 2024-02-16
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612008000500007$2DOI
100 1 $aMARCELINO, F. C.
245 $aDetection and quantification of Roundup Ready soybean residues in sausage samples by conventional and real-time PCR.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2008
500 $aSupl.
520 $aThe increasing presence of products derived from genetically modified (GM) plants in human and animal diets has led to the development of detection methods to distinguish biotechnology-derived foods from conventional ones. The conventional and real-time PCR have been used, respectively, to detect and quantify GM residues in highly processed foods. DNA extraction is a critical step during the analysis process. Some factors such as DNA degradation, matrix effects, and the presence of PCR inhibitors imply that a detection or quantification limit, established for a given method, is restricted to a matrix used during validation and cannot be projected to any other matrix outside the scope of the method. In Brazil, sausage samples were the main class of processed products in which Roundup Ready® (RR) soybean residues were detected. Thus, the validation of methodologies for the detection and quantification of those residues is absolutely necessary. Sausage samples were submitted to two different methods of DNA extraction: modified Wizard and the CTAB method. The yield and quality were compared for both methods. DNA samples were analyzed by conventional and real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of Roundup Ready® soybean in the samples. At least 200 ng of total sausage DNA was necessary for a reliable quantification. Reactions containing DNA amounts below this value led to large variations on the expected GM percentage value. In conventional PCR, the detection limit varied from 1.0 to 500 ng, depending on the GM soybean content in the sample. The precision, performance, and linearity were relatively high indicating that the method used for analysis was satisfactory.
653 $aGMO
653 $aPCR quantitative
653 $aSausage
653 $aTransgenic residues
700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, M. F. M.
700 1 $aBARROS, E. G.
773 $tCiência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas$gv. 28, p. 38-45, 2008.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/05/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/03/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
RECH, I.; POLIDORO, J. C.; PAVINATO, P. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
IONÁ RECH, USP-ESALQ; JOSE CARLOS POLIDORO, CNPS; PAULO SÉRGIO PAVINATO, USP-ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Additives incorporated into urea to reduce nitrogen losses after application to the soil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 52, n. 3, p. 194-204, mar. 2017. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2017000300007 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Aditivos incorporados à ureia para reduzir perdas de nitrogênio após aplicação ao solo. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this work was to develop urea-based fertilizers with internal incorporation of urease inhibitors and other additives in the granule. The effects of the incorporation of NBPT, copper (Cu+2), boric acid (H3BO3), elemental sulphur (Sº), and a clay mineral from the zeolite group in powder urea - with ten different combinations of these additives - were evaluated as to N losses by volatilization and leaching. The losses in laboratory-developed formulations were compared with those of commercial fertilizers coated with the same additives (Super N, FH Nitro Mais, and FH Nitro Gold). The evaluations were made in greenhouse conditions, using a Ultisol accommodated in PVC columns. Nitrate and ammonium leaching was evaluated in the solution percolated through the soil columns. Ammonia volatilization was measured with a semi-open static chamber. The incorporation of urease inhibitors (NBPT, H3BO3, and Cu+2) into the urea granules was efficient to reduce N volatilization. Ammonia volatilization in the laboratory-developed ureas was lower than in commercial fertilizers coated with the same additives, while ammonium sulfate losses by leaching were similar. The addition of zeolite does not reduce N volatilization. Mineral N leaching in the soil profile is not affected by urease inhibitors. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Ammonia volatilization; Inibidor de urease; NBPT; Volatilizaçãode amônia. |
|
Thesagro: |
Fertilizante nitrogenado; Lixiviação. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Leaching; Nitrogen fertilizers; Urease inhibitors. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/180157/1/Additives-incorporated-into-urea-to-reduce-nitrogen-losses-after-application-to-the-soil.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/159879/1/Additives-incorporated-into.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02296naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2070022
005 2022-03-30
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2017000300007$2DOI
100 1 $aRECH, I.
245 $aAdditives incorporated into urea to reduce nitrogen losses after application to the soil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aTítulo em português: Aditivos incorporados à ureia para reduzir perdas de nitrogênio após aplicação ao solo.
520 $aThe objective of this work was to develop urea-based fertilizers with internal incorporation of urease inhibitors and other additives in the granule. The effects of the incorporation of NBPT, copper (Cu+2), boric acid (H3BO3), elemental sulphur (Sº), and a clay mineral from the zeolite group in powder urea - with ten different combinations of these additives - were evaluated as to N losses by volatilization and leaching. The losses in laboratory-developed formulations were compared with those of commercial fertilizers coated with the same additives (Super N, FH Nitro Mais, and FH Nitro Gold). The evaluations were made in greenhouse conditions, using a Ultisol accommodated in PVC columns. Nitrate and ammonium leaching was evaluated in the solution percolated through the soil columns. Ammonia volatilization was measured with a semi-open static chamber. The incorporation of urease inhibitors (NBPT, H3BO3, and Cu+2) into the urea granules was efficient to reduce N volatilization. Ammonia volatilization in the laboratory-developed ureas was lower than in commercial fertilizers coated with the same additives, while ammonium sulfate losses by leaching were similar. The addition of zeolite does not reduce N volatilization. Mineral N leaching in the soil profile is not affected by urease inhibitors.
650 $aLeaching
650 $aNitrogen fertilizers
650 $aUrease inhibitors
650 $aFertilizante nitrogenado
650 $aLixiviação
653 $aAmmonia volatilization
653 $aInibidor de urease
653 $aNBPT
653 $aVolatilizaçãode amônia
700 1 $aPOLIDORO, J. C.
700 1 $aPAVINATO, P. S.
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 52, n. 3, p. 194-204, mar. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
